1 link tagged with all of: banking + geopolitics + payments + monetary policy
Click any tag below to further narrow down your results
Links
USD stablecoins like USDT and USDC currently control 99% of the market, but the author argues local currency stablecoins are inevitable because every real economy runs on domestic currency, and governments will demand control over their monetary systems. The growth signals are already there: local stablecoins have grown 4x in 20 months while transfer velocity jumped 16x.
- Local stablecoins are growing 4x faster than USD-pegged ones (from $379m to $1.6b in 20 months), with transfer volume up 16x, showing organic adoption for actual payments, remittances, and payroll rather than speculation.
- Governments will restrict USD stablecoins if adoption threatens monetary policy control, and geopolitical risk from US sanctions authority (OFAC) embedded in stablecoin design will push nations toward local alternatives.
- Banks and payment providers already own customer relationships and distribution in each jurisdiction—they have no incentive to hand that to Circle or Tether when they can issue their own local stablecoins and keep the economics.
- The real opportunity mirrors the Eurodollar market: USD stablecoins serve offshore/cross-border needs while local stablecoins handle domestic payments, creating a two-layer system rather than replacement.